The Rowlatt Act, also known as the Anarchical and Revolutionary Crimes Act of 1919, was a controversial law passed by the British government in India during the early 20th century. The act was named after Sir Sidney Rowlatt, the chairman of the committee that drafted the legislation. The Rowlatt Act was a significant turning point in Indian history and had far-reaching consequences for the country’s struggle for independence from British rule. In this article, we will discuss the background, provisions, and impact of the Rowlatt Act.
Table of Contents
Background
During the early 20th century, India was a British colony, and the Indian National Congress (INC) had been formed with the aim of achieving self-rule for India. However, the British government was not willing to grant India complete independence, and tensions between the British and Indian leaders were rising. In 1919, the British government proposed the Rowlatt Act, which was intended to combat revolutionary and anarchical activities in India.
Provisions
The Rowlatt Act gave the British government unprecedented powers to suppress any form of dissent in India. The act allowed the government to arrest and imprison any individual without trial for up to two years. It also enabled the government to detain any individual suspected of revolutionary or anarchical activities without any evidence. The act also prohibited the freedom of speech, assembly, and press. Additionally, the act authorized the government to search and seize any property without a warrant.
Impact
The Act was met with widespread protests across India. Mahatma Gandhi, who had just returned to India from South Africa, played a significant role in leading the protests against the act. On April 6, 1919, a nationwide strike was called to protest the Rowlatt Act, which was observed by millions of Indians. The protest turned violent in some parts of the country, and the British government responded with brutal force, resulting in hundreds of deaths and thousands of injuries.
The Rowlatt Act became a turning point in the Indian independence movement. The act exposed the oppressive nature of British rule and strengthened the resolve of Indian leaders to fight for independence. The protests against the act led to the formation of the Non-Cooperation Movement, which was led by Gandhi and aimed to boycott British goods and institutions. The movement played a significant role in India’s struggle for independence and led to the British government granting India partial self-rule in 1935 and complete independence in 1947.
Conclusion
The Rowlatt Act was a significant turning point in Indian history and had far-reaching consequences for the country’s struggle for independence. The act gave the British government unprecedented powers to suppress dissent in India, leading to widespread protests and violence. The protests against the act strengthened the resolve of Indian leaders to fight for independence and played a significant role in the Non-Cooperation Movement, which was instrumental in achieving Indian independence.
Rowlatt Act: Summary
- The Rowlatt Act was a law passed by the British government in India in 1919.
- It aimed to combat revolutionary and anarchical activities in India.
- The act allowed the government to arrest and imprison individuals without trial for up to two years.
- It also prohibited freedom of speech, assembly, and press.
- The act led to widespread protests and strikes across India.
- The protests exposed the oppressive nature of British rule in India.
- The act became a turning point in India’s struggle for independence.
- The protests led to the formation of the Non-Cooperation Movement, which aimed to boycott British goods and institutions.
- The movement played a significant role in achieving Indian independence.
- The Rowlatt Act was repealed in 1922.
Rowlatt Act: Questions
Q. What was the main purpose of the Rowlatt Act?
A) To grant India complete independence from British rule
B) To suppress any form of dissent in India
C) To improve economic conditions in India
D) To establish democratic governance in India
Answer: B) To suppress any form of dissent in India.
Explanation: The Rowlatt Act was passed by the British government in India in 1919, and its main purpose was to combat revolutionary and anarchical activities in India. The act gave the government unprecedented powers to suppress any form of dissent in India and allowed them to arrest and imprison individuals without trial for up to two years. The act also prohibited freedom of speech, assembly, and press. Therefore, option B is the correct answer. Option A is incorrect because the act was passed to suppress dissent, not to grant India independence. Option C is incorrect because the act did not aim to improve economic conditions in India. Option D is incorrect because the act did not aim to establish democratic governance in India.
Q. Who was the chairman of the committee that drafted the Rowlatt Act?
A) Mahatma Gandhi
B) Winston Churchill
C) Sir Sidney Rowlatt
D) Jawaharlal Nehru
Answer: C) Sir Sidney Rowlatt.
Explanation: The Rowlatt Act was named after Sir Sidney Rowlatt, who was the chairman of the committee that drafted the legislation. Therefore, option C is the correct answer. Option A is incorrect because Mahatma Gandhi was a leader who played a significant role in protesting against the Rowlatt Act. Option B is incorrect because Winston Churchill was a British politician who opposed Indian independence. Option D is incorrect because Jawaharlal Nehru was a leader who played a significant role in India’s struggle for independence.
Q. When was the Rowlatt Act passed?
A) 1905
B) 1919
C) 1922
D) 1935
Answer: B) 1919.
Explanation: The Rowlatt Act was passed by the British government in India in 1919. Therefore, option B is the correct answer. Option A is incorrect because 1905 is not the correct year for the passing of the Rowlatt Act. Option C is incorrect because 1922 is the year when the Rowlatt Act was repealed. Option D is incorrect because 1935 is the year when the British government granted India partial self-rule.
Q. What was the response of the British government to the protests against the Rowlatt Act?
A) They repealed the act immediately
B) They negotiated with Indian leaders to reach a compromise
C) They used brutal force to suppress the protests
D) They ignored the protests and let them continue
Answer: C) They used brutal force to suppress the protests.
Explanation: The protests against the Rowlatt Act led to a nationwide strike in India, and the British government responded with brutal force, resulting in hundreds of deaths and thousands of injuries. Therefore, option C is the correct answer. Option A is incorrect because the Rowlatt Act was not repealed immediately. Option B is incorrect because the British government did not negotiate with Indian leaders to reach a compromise. Option D is incorrect because the British government did not ignore the protests but rather used force to suppress them.
Q. What was the significance of the Rowlatt Act in India’s struggle for independence?
A) It granted India complete independence from British rule
B) It exposed the oppressive nature of British rule in India
C) It improved economic conditions in India
D) It established democratic governance in India
Answer: B) It exposed the oppressive nature of British rule in India.
Explanation: The Rowlatt Act became a turning point in India’s struggle for independence because it exposed the oppressive nature of British rule in India and strengthened the resolve of Indian leaders to fight for independence. Therefore, option B is the correct answer. Option A is incorrect because the Rowlatt Act did not grant India complete independence from British rule. Option C is incorrect because the act did not aim to improve economic conditions in India. Option D is incorrect because the act did not aim to establish democratic governance in India.
Important Links