Group – A
(Attempt all questions | Word Limit: 300 | Marks: 20 each)
-
(a) Explain the concept of Accountability.
(b) Examine the dimensions of Accountability for Good Governance. -
(a) Examine the background of the Sarkaria Commission.
(b) Discuss the major recommendations of the Sarkaria Commission. -
(a) Explain Article 35A of the Indian Constitution.
(b) “Revocation of Special Status and Domicile Law in Jammu and Kashmir is a positive step towards National Integrity.” Discuss. -
(a) “Article 263 of the Indian Constitution is the Custodian of Inter-State Relations in India.” Discuss.
(b) “The Inter-State Council is more advisory than effective.” Comment. -
(a) Examine the provisions of Social Justice as incorporated in the Indian Constitution.
(b) “Law is a catalyst to reach the ladder of Social Justice.” Examine this statement.
Group – B
(Attempt any 10 out of 12 | Word Limit: 250 | Marks: 15 each)
6. “Legitimacy of institutions and popular support are the key factors in Good Governance.” Explain.
7. (a) Explain the salient features of Good Governance.
(b) What are the pre-conditions for Good Governance?
8. (a) Explain federal form of Government.
(b) Examine the issues in Indian federalism.
9. (a) Examine the role of the Governor with reference to passage of Bills.
(b) What are the challenges associated with Governor’s office? Examine.
10. (a) Analyse the role of Government in regulating data privacy and cyber-security.
(b) Explain about data privacy and cyber-security framework in India.
11. (a) “Power worship blurs political judgement.” Comment on this statement in the light of Indian electoral politics.
(b) “Democracy governed by a dominant party appears very different from a democracy with no dominant party.” Comment in Indian experience.
12. (a) Trace out the causes for Inter-State border disputes in India.
(b) Discuss the issues and the mechanism to resolve border issues.
13. (a) Examine the concerns of Odisha State in respect of sharing of Mahanadi water.
(b) Examine the status of Chhattisgarh-Odisha Mahanadi water dispute. What is the way forward?
14. (a) What is Social Justice and what is the status of woman in Indian society?
(b) Examine the legal status of women in India.
15. (a) What are the Constitutional provisions of Social Justice guaranteed in India?
(b) Discuss about Government of India’s initiatives to make Social Justice a reality.
16. (a) (i) Explain democratic decentralisation. (ii) Examine the impact of 73rd Constitutional Amendment on decentralisation of power and functioning of Panchayats.
(b) Examine the impact of 74th Constitutional Amendment on decentralisation of power and functioning of Municipalities.
17. (a) What is Freebie? Draw the difference between Freebies and Welfare.
(b) “Freebies culture by political parties is a double-edged sword.” Examine this statement.
OPSC Main Exam 2023 GS Paper II Solution
1. (a) Explain the concept of Accountability.
Ans: Accountability refers to the obligation of public officials and institutions to explain their actions, accept responsibility for their decisions, and face consequences for their performance. It is a cornerstone of democratic governance that ensures transparency and responsiveness in public administration.
Accountability encompasses three key elements: answerability (obligation to provide information and justification), responsibility (acceptance of ownership for decisions), and enforceability (mechanisms to impose sanctions for poor performance).
There are multiple types of accountability: Political accountability through elections and parliamentary oversight, legal accountability through courts and judicial review, administrative accountability through internal controls and audit mechanisms, and social accountability through civil society and media scrutiny.
The concept operates at various levels – individual accountability of public servants, institutional accountability of government departments, and systemic accountability of the entire governance framework. Modern accountability mechanisms include Right to Information Acts, ombudsman institutions, performance audits, and citizen report cards.
Effective accountability requires clear standards, reliable information systems, accessible grievance mechanisms, and political will to enforce consequences. It serves as a check against corruption, promotes efficient resource utilization, and builds public trust in government institutions.
(b) Examine the dimensions of Accountability for Good Governance.
Good governance fundamentally depends on robust accountability mechanisms operating across multiple dimensions that ensure democratic values and effective public service delivery.
Vertical Accountability represents the relationship between citizens and government, primarily through electoral processes, referendums, and participatory governance mechanisms. Citizens hold elected representatives accountable through periodic elections, while continuous engagement occurs through public consultations and feedback mechanisms.
Horizontal Accountability involves checks and balances among different branches and levels of government. Legislative oversight of the executive, judicial review of government actions, and inter-governmental accountability between central, state, and local bodies ensure power distribution and prevent abuse.
Diagonal Accountability emerges through civil society organizations, media, and citizen groups that monitor government performance and advocate for public interests. This dimension bridges the gap between formal institutional mechanisms and grassroots democratic participation.
Internal Accountability operates within government institutions through hierarchical supervision, performance management systems, internal audit mechanisms, and professional codes of conduct. This ensures organizational discipline and service standards.
External Accountability functions through independent institutions like audit agencies, ombudsman offices, human rights commissions, and regulatory bodies that provide external oversight and investigation capabilities.
Temporal Accountability considers both retrospective responsibility for past actions and prospective commitment to future performance, ensuring continuity in governance standards across political transitions.
These dimensions collectively create a comprehensive accountability ecosystem that promotes transparency, responsiveness, effectiveness, and legitimacy in governance, ultimately serving the public interest and democratic ideals.
2. (a) Examine the background of the Sarkaria Commission.
Ans: The Sarkaria Commission was established in 1983 under the chairmanship of Justice Ranjit Singh Sarkaria to examine Centre-State relations in India’s federal structure. The Commission emerged from growing concerns about the deteriorating relationship between the Union and State governments.
Historical Context: By the 1980s, India faced significant federal tensions. The increasing use of Article 356 (President’s Rule), conflicts over resource allocation, disputes regarding the role of Governors, and the emergence of regional political parties challenging national parties created an urgent need for federal restructuring.
Immediate Triggers included the dismissal of nine opposition-ruled state governments in 1977, frequent imposition of President’s Rule, conflicts during Indira Gandhi’s tenure, and demands from various states for greater autonomy. The Anandpur Sahib Resolution by Akali Dal and similar autonomy movements across states highlighted the federal strain.
Constitutional Background: The Indian Constitution established a strong federal structure with significant central powers. However, practical governance revealed gaps in Centre-State coordination, ambiguities in power distribution, and inadequate mechanisms for resolving federal disputes.
Political Dynamics: The era of one-party dominance was ending, with regional parties gaining prominence. Coalition politics at the center and diverse party control in states necessitated a review of federal arrangements to accommodate political plurality.
Terms of Reference were comprehensive, covering Centre-State relations, the role of Governors, emergency provisions, river water disputes, deployment of central forces, and recommendations for improving federal harmony.
The Commission represented a landmark effort to scientifically examine India’s federal structure and propose reforms for sustainable Centre-State relations in a diverse democracy.
2. (b) Discuss the major recommendations of the Sarkaria Commission.
The Sarkaria Commission submitted its report in 1988 with 247 recommendations aimed at strengthening India’s federal structure and improving Centre-State relations across multiple dimensions.
Governor’s Role: The Commission recommended that Governors should be appointed from outside the concerned state, preferably from persons not actively associated with politics. They should serve full five-year terms unless exceptional circumstances warrant removal. Governors should act as bridges between Centre and States rather than as agents of the central government.
Article 356 (President’s Rule): The Commission suggested restricting the use of President’s Rule to situations where constitutional machinery has genuinely broken down. It recommended that before imposing President’s Rule, the Centre should issue a warning to the state government, and Parliament should approve the proclamation within two months rather than immediately.
Inter-Governmental Council: The Commission strongly recommended establishing a permanent Inter-Governmental Council under Article 263 to facilitate regular consultation between Centre and States on policy matters of common interest.
Financial Relations: Recommendations included increasing states’ share in central taxes, reducing the number of centrally sponsored schemes, and providing greater flexibility to states in utilizing central assistance.
Emergency Provisions: The Commission suggested that National Emergency should not be proclaimed unless the security of India is threatened by war or external aggression. Internal disturbances alone should not justify emergency imposition.
Administrative Relations: The Commission recommended limiting central intervention in state subjects, reducing the number of central agencies operating in states, and strengthening federal consultation mechanisms.
Residuary Powers: It suggested that residuary powers should be distributed between Centre and States based on the principle of subsidiarity, with local and regional matters handled by states.
These recommendations aimed at creating a more balanced federal structure while maintaining national unity.
3. (a) Explain Article 35A of the Indian Constitution.
Article 35A was a constitutional provision that granted special powers to the Jammu and Kashmir legislature to define “permanent residents” of the state and provide them with special rights and privileges. It was incorporated into the Constitution through a Presidential Order in 1954 under Article 370.
Historical Background: Article 35A originated from the Instrument of Accession signed by Maharaja Hari Singh in 1947 and the Delhi Agreement of 1952 between Prime Minister Nehru and Sheikh Abdullah. It was added to the Constitution through the Constitution (Application to Jammu and Kashmir) Order, 1954.
Key Provisions: The article empowered the J&K legislature to define permanent residents and restrict the sale of immovable property to them exclusively. It prohibited non-permanent residents from acquiring property, settling permanently, or securing government employment in the state. The provision also restricted voting rights in local body elections to permanent residents.
Permanent Resident Definition: Under the Jammu and Kashmir Constitution Act, 1956, permanent residents were defined as persons who were state subjects on May 14, 1954, or had acquired property before that date and resided in the state for ten years.
Constitutional Status: Article 35A was unique as it was never debated in Parliament but was incorporated through a Presidential Order. This constitutional methodology became a subject of legal and political controversy over decades.
Legal Implications: The provision created a dual citizenship concept within India, granting special privileges to J&K residents while restricting rights of other Indian citizens. It affected property rights, employment opportunities, educational admissions, and political participation.
Challenges: Various legal challenges questioned its constitutional validity, arguing it violated principles of equality and fundamental rights guaranteed to all Indian citizens under the Constitution.
3. (b) “Revocation of Special Status and Domicile Law in Jammu and Kashmir is a positive step towards National Integrity.” Discuss.
Ans: The revocation of Article 370 and 35A in August 2019 represents a significant constitutional and political transformation that has generated diverse perspectives on national integration and regional autonomy.
Arguments Supporting National Integrity:
Constitutional Uniformity: Revocation establishes uniform application of the Indian Constitution across all territories, eliminating the anomaly of dual constitutional standards. All fundamental rights, directive principles, and constitutional provisions now apply equally to J&K residents.
Economic Integration: Removal of property restrictions enables investment from other states, potentially accelerating economic development through industrial growth, tourism expansion, and infrastructure development. This economic integration strengthens national economic unity.
Administrative Efficiency: Implementation of central laws and schemes ensures better governance standards, anti-corruption mechanisms, and developmental programs. Central institutions like CAG, CVC, and CIC now have jurisdiction, enhancing transparency.
Social Justice: Central reservation policies for SCs, STs, and OBCs now apply, potentially improving social equity. Women’s rights are strengthened through uniform personal laws and property rights.
Counter-Arguments and Concerns:
Democratic Process: Critics argue the revocation occurred without consulting the state legislature or people, potentially undermining democratic principles and federal consultation norms.
Cultural Identity: Concerns exist about preserving local culture, language, and traditions in the face of demographic and economic changes resulting from increased external investment and settlement.
Regional Autonomy: The transformation from statehood to Union Territory status reduces local self-governance and democratic representation, concentrating power with the central government.
Historical Commitments: Arguments suggest the revocation violates historical commitments made during accession, potentially affecting trust in federal arrangements.
Balanced Assessment: While the integration promotes constitutional unity and potentially accelerates development, its long-term success depends on inclusive implementation, respect for local aspirations, and restoration of democratic processes.
4. (a) “Article 263 of the Indian Constitution is the Custodian of Inter-State Relations in India.” Discuss.
Ans: Article 263 serves as the constitutional foundation for managing inter-state relations in India’s federal structure by providing mechanisms for coordination, consultation, and dispute resolution between states and the Union government.
Constitutional Provisions: Article 263 empowers the President to establish an Inter-State Council if public interest demands it. The Council’s functions include inquiring into and advising on disputes between states, investigating matters of common interest, and making recommendations for better coordination of policy and action.
Custodial Role in Inter-State Relations:
Dispute Resolution Mechanism: Article 263 provides a political forum for resolving inter-state disputes that don’t require judicial intervention. Unlike Article 131 which provides for legal disputes in the Supreme Court, Article 263 addresses political and administrative conflicts through consultation and negotiation.
Policy Coordination: The Council serves as a platform for harmonizing policies across states, particularly in areas of concurrent jurisdiction where coordination is essential for effective implementation. This prevents conflicting state policies that could undermine national objectives.
Federal Consultation: It institutionalizes regular Centre-State dialogue, ensuring that national policies consider regional perspectives and that states have input in decisions affecting them. This consultation mechanism strengthens federal democracy.
Conflict Prevention: By providing a forum for discussion before disputes escalate, Article 263 serves a preventive function, addressing grievances and misunderstandings before they become serious conflicts.
Limitations: However, Article 263’s effectiveness depends on political will and the discretionary power of the President. The Council is advisory, not mandatory, and its recommendations are not binding, limiting its authority.
Practical Implementation: The Inter-State Council established in 1990 has addressed various issues including river water disputes, border disputes, and policy coordination, though its impact has been limited by infrequent meetings and lack of follow-up mechanisms.
Article 263 thus serves as the constitutional custodian by providing the institutional framework for inter-state relations, though its effectiveness requires stronger political commitment and procedural improvements.
4. (b) “The Inter-State Council is more advisory than effective.” Comment.
The Inter-State Council, established under Article 263 in 1990, has indeed functioned more as an advisory body than an effective institution for resolving inter-state issues, reflecting both constitutional limitations and practical challenges.
Advisory Nature by Design:
Constitutional Framework: Article 263 specifically empowers the Council to “inquire into and advise upon” disputes and matters of common interest. The Constitution deliberately made it advisory rather than binding, reflecting the founders’ preference for consultation over compulsion in federal relations.
Non-Binding Recommendations: The Council’s recommendations are not legally enforceable, unlike judicial decisions or statutory provisions. States and the Centre can accept or reject recommendations based on their political judgment, limiting the Council’s authority.
Limited Effectiveness in Practice:
Infrequent Meetings: The Council has met irregularly since its establishment, with long gaps between sessions. This sporadic functioning prevents it from addressing urgent inter-state issues promptly or maintaining continuous dialogue.
Political Considerations: The Council’s effectiveness often depends on the political relations between the Centre and states. When different parties control the Centre and states, political considerations can override the Council’s recommendations.
Lack of Follow-up Mechanisms: There are no institutional mechanisms to ensure implementation of the Council’s recommendations or to monitor compliance by states and the Centre.
Competing Institutions: Other forums like the Goods and Services Tax Council, Finance Commission, and Planning Commission (now NITI Aayog) often handle matters that could fall within the Inter-State Council’s purview, diluting its relevance.
Examples of Limited Impact: Despite recommendations on river water disputes, border issues, and policy coordination, many problems remain unresolved, with states preferring direct negotiation or judicial intervention.
Structural Improvements Needed: To enhance effectiveness, the Council needs regular meetings, dedicated secretariat, follow-up mechanisms, and greater political commitment from both Centre and states.
While the advisory nature reflects constitutional wisdom about federal consultation, stronger procedural frameworks could enhance the Council’s practical effectiveness in managing inter-state relations.
5. (a) Examine the provisions of Social Justice as incorporated in the Indian Constitution.
The Indian Constitution comprehensively incorporates Social Justice through multiple provisions spanning fundamental rights, directive principles, and special measures, reflecting the framers’ commitment to creating an egalitarian society.
Fundamental Rights Ensuring Social Justice:
Article 14 guarantees equality before law and equal protection of laws, forming the foundation of social justice by prohibiting arbitrary discrimination and ensuring equal treatment.
Articles 15-16 prohibit discrimination based on religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth, while allowing positive discrimination for socially disadvantaged groups. Article 16(4) specifically permits reservation in public employment for backward classes.
Article 17 abolishes untouchability, directly addressing caste-based social injustice and prohibiting discriminatory practices that perpetuated social hierarchy.
Article 21 guarantees the right to life and personal liberty, interpreted broadly to include right to livelihood, education, healthcare, and dignified living conditions.
Directive Principles of State Policy:
Article 38 directs the state to promote welfare and minimize inequalities in income, status, facilities, and opportunities among individuals and groups.
Article 39 mandates equal right to livelihood, prevention of concentration of wealth, and ensuring that economic systems serve common good rather than individual interests.
Articles 41-42 promote right to work, education, public assistance, and humane working conditions, establishing the state’s obligation to provide social security.
Article 46 specifically directs promotion of educational and economic interests of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and weaker sections, with protection from social injustice and exploitation.
Special Constitutional Provisions:
Reservation System: Articles 330, 332, and 335 provide for reservation in legislatures and services for SCs and STs, ensuring political representation and economic opportunities.
Fifth and Sixth Schedules provide special protections for tribal areas, preserving their cultural identity and self-governance while ensuring development.
These provisions collectively create a constitutional framework for achieving social justice through legal equality, positive discrimination, and state-directed welfare measures.
5. (b) “Law is a catalyst to reach the ladder of Social Justice.” Examine this statement.
Law serves as a powerful catalyst for social justice by providing institutional mechanisms, normative frameworks, and enforcement tools to transform social relations and ensure equitable development, though its effectiveness depends on implementation and social acceptance.
Law as an Instrument of Social Transformation:
Constitutional Foundation: The Indian Constitution itself demonstrates law’s catalytic role by abolishing untouchability, prohibiting discrimination, and mandating positive action for disadvantaged groups. These legal provisions initiated social change by delegitimizing traditional hierarchies.
Legislative Interventions: Laws like the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, Right to Education Act, MGNREGA, and land reform legislation have directly addressed social inequalities by providing legal protection, economic opportunities, and social services.
Judicial Activism: Courts have expanded the scope of social justice through progressive interpretations, such as recognizing right to food, shelter, and healthcare as part of Article 21, mandating reservations in private institutions, and ensuring environmental justice.
Catalytic Mechanisms:
Normative Change: Law shapes social attitudes by declaring certain practices illegal and others as rights, gradually changing social norms and expectations about equality and justice.
Institutional Creation: Legal frameworks establish institutions like National Human Rights Commission, Women’s Commissions, and Social Justice Departments that actively promote equality and address discrimination.
Empowerment Tool: Laws like RTI Act and legal aid provisions empower marginalized communities to access information, challenge injustice, and seek remedies through legal processes.
Limitations and Challenges:
Implementation Gap: Many social justice laws remain ineffective due to poor implementation, lack of resources, and bureaucratic apathy, limiting their catalytic potential.
Social Resistance: Legal changes often face resistance from dominant social groups, requiring sustained effort and social mobilization to achieve intended outcomes.
Access Barriers: Complex legal procedures, costs, and lack of awareness prevent marginalized communities from effectively using law for social justice.
Positive Examples: Reservation policies have created a new middle class among SCs/STs, anti-dowry laws have raised awareness about women’s rights, and environmental laws have promoted sustainable development.
Law thus serves as a crucial catalyst for social justice, but its effectiveness requires strong implementation mechanisms, social support, and continuous adaptation to emerging challenges.
Group – B
(Attempt any 10 out of 12 | Word Limit: 250 | Marks: 15 each)
6. “Legitimacy of institutions and popular support are the key factors in Good Governance.” Explain.
Ans: Legitimacy and popular support form the foundational pillars of good governance, creating the essential trust and acceptance necessary for effective democratic administration and policy implementation.
Institutional Legitimacy refers to the public’s belief that governing institutions have the rightful authority to make binding decisions. This legitimacy emerges from constitutional foundations, democratic processes, rule of law, and institutional accountability. When institutions operate transparently, follow due process, and remain responsive to public needs, they gain legitimacy that enhances their effectiveness.
Popular Support represents the active endorsement and participation of citizens in governance processes. It manifests through electoral participation, civic engagement, compliance with laws, and constructive feedback to government policies. Popular support transforms governance from mere authority-based rule to participatory democracy.
Interconnected Relationship: Legitimacy and popular support are mutually reinforcing. Legitimate institutions earn popular support through fair and effective governance, while popular support strengthens institutional legitimacy by providing democratic validation. This creates a virtuous cycle of trust and effectiveness.
Impact on Good Governance: These factors enhance policy implementation by reducing resistance and increasing voluntary compliance. Citizens are more likely to follow laws and participate constructively when they trust institutions. Legitimate institutions with popular support can undertake difficult but necessary reforms, maintain social stability, and respond effectively to crises.
Challenges: Loss of legitimacy through corruption, authoritarianism, or ineffectiveness leads to popular discontent, civil disobedience, and governance failure. Contemporary challenges include managing diverse expectations, ensuring inclusive representation, and maintaining legitimacy amid rapid social change.
Indian Context: India’s democratic institutions derive legitimacy from constitutional authority and electoral mandate, while popular support varies based on performance, inclusivity, and responsiveness to regional and social diversity.
Without legitimacy and popular support, even well-designed institutions become ineffective, leading to governance crisis and social instability.
7. (a) Explain the salient features of Good Governance.
Ans: Good Governance encompasses a comprehensive framework of principles and practices that ensure effective, responsive, and accountable public administration serving the common good.
Transparency ensures open access to government information, decision-making processes, and policy formulation. Citizens have the right to know how public resources are utilized and how decisions affecting them are made. This includes proactive disclosure, Right to Information mechanisms, and public consultation processes.
Accountability establishes clear responsibility chains where public officials must explain their actions, accept consequences for performance, and face sanctions for misconduct. This includes political, administrative, legal, and social accountability mechanisms.
Responsiveness requires government institutions to serve all stakeholders within reasonable timeframes, addressing public needs and concerns promptly and effectively. This involves citizen-centric service delivery and adaptive policy-making.
Effectiveness and Efficiency ensure optimal utilization of resources to achieve desired outcomes with minimal waste. This includes result-oriented administration, performance measurement, and continuous improvement processes.
Rule of Law guarantees equal treatment under law, protection of fundamental rights, and impartial enforcement of legal provisions. Independent judiciary and fair legal processes are essential components.
Participation promotes inclusive decision-making where all affected stakeholders, especially marginalized groups, have opportunities to influence policies and programs that affect them.
Equity and Inclusiveness ensure that all citizens have opportunities to improve their well-being and that no one is excluded from governance processes based on identity or status.
Consensus Orientation seeks broad agreement on policies and priorities through dialogue, negotiation, and accommodation of diverse interests.
These features collectively create a governance system that is legitimate, effective, and serves the public interest while maintaining democratic values and human rights.
(b) What are the pre-conditions for Good Governance?
Ans: Pre-conditions for Good Governance encompass structural, institutional, and cultural prerequisites that create an enabling environment for effective democratic administration.
Constitutional Framework provides the fundamental legal architecture establishing separation of powers, checks and balances, fundamental rights, and federal structure. A well-designed constitution ensures institutional autonomy, protects minority rights, and establishes governance principles.
Independent Institutions including judiciary, election commission, audit agencies, and anti-corruption bodies must operate without political interference. These institutions provide essential oversight, ensure accountability, and maintain democratic integrity.
Rule of Law requires an impartial legal system that applies laws equally to all citizens regardless of status, wealth, or political connections. This includes accessible courts, competent legal professionals, and fair enforcement mechanisms.
Professional Civil Service with merit-based recruitment, adequate training, performance-based evaluation, and protection from political interference ensures continuity and competence in administration. Civil servants must be committed to public service rather than partisan interests.
Active Civil Society including NGOs, media, professional associations, and citizen groups provides essential monitoring, advocacy, and participation in governance processes. Free media ensures information flow and accountability.
Political Will from leadership committed to democratic values, transparency, and public welfare is crucial for implementing governance reforms and maintaining institutional integrity.
Economic Development provides resources necessary for effective governance while reducing poverty and inequality that can undermine democratic stability.
Education and Awareness among citizens enables informed participation, demand for accountability, and understanding of rights and responsibilities.
Technology Infrastructure facilitates transparent service delivery, information access, and citizen engagement through digital governance platforms.
Social Capital including trust, cooperation, and civic engagement among citizens strengthens democratic participation and reduces social conflicts that can disrupt governance.
These pre-conditions create the foundation upon which good governance practices can be built and sustained over time.
8. (a) Explain federal form of Government.
Ans: Federal form of Government is a constitutional arrangement where power is divided between central and regional governments, each having independent authority within their designated spheres while maintaining unity under a common constitutional framework.
Key Characteristics include written constitution that clearly demarcates powers between different levels of government, dual government structure with central and state governments operating simultaneously, and division of powers through legislative lists specifying central, state, and concurrent subjects.
Constitutional Supremacy ensures that both central and state governments derive authority from the constitution rather than from each other. Neither level can unilaterally alter the power distribution without following constitutional amendment procedures.
Independent Judiciary acts as arbiter in center-state disputes, interprets constitutional provisions, and maintains federal balance. Courts ensure that neither level exceeds its constitutional authority.
Rigid Constitution makes amendments difficult, requiring special procedures and often super-majorities, protecting federal structure from easy alterations by temporary political majorities.
Bicameralism at the central level often includes an upper house representing regional interests, ensuring state participation in national decision-making.
Types of Federalism: Dual Federalism maintains strict separation between central and state functions, while Cooperative Federalism emphasizes collaboration and shared responsibilities in governance.
Advantages include accommodation of diversity, prevention of concentration of power, promotion of local governance, and protection of regional interests while maintaining national unity.
Examples: The United States practices dual federalism with clear separation, while countries like India, Canada, and Australia follow cooperative federalism with extensive central-state collaboration.
Contemporary Relevance: Modern federalism adapts to globalization, economic integration, and complex governance challenges requiring multi-level coordination while preserving democratic values and regional autonomy.
Federal systems balance unity and diversity, enabling effective governance in large, diverse nations.
(b) Examine the issues in Indian federalism.
Ans: Indian federalism faces multiple challenges arising from constitutional design, political dynamics, and socio-economic complexities that affect center-state relations and federal balance.
Constitutional Issues: India follows quasi-federal structure with strong central government. The Union List contains more subjects than State List, emergency provisions allow central intervention, and Governor’s role creates federal tensions. Article 356 (President’s Rule) has been misused for political purposes, undermining state autonomy.
Financial Imbalance: States have limited revenue sources compared to expenditure responsibilities. Vertical fiscal imbalance makes states dependent on central transfers, while horizontal imbalances create disparities among states. GST implementation has further centralized tax collection, affecting state autonomy.
Political Challenges: Coalition politics at center and different parties ruling states create coordination difficulties. Political competition often takes precedence over cooperative federalism. Use of central agencies like CBI, ED for political purposes strains federal relations.
Administrative Issues: Centrally Sponsored Schemes with rigid guidelines limit state flexibility. Multiplicity of central agencies operating in states creates coordination problems. Delay in central approvals affects state projects and development initiatives.
Inter-State Disputes: River water disputes (Cauvery, Krishna, Narmada), border disputes (Karnataka-Maharashtra, Assam-Meghalaya), and resource sharing conflicts strain federal harmony.
Language and Cultural Issues: Hindi imposition concerns in non-Hindi states, cultural homogenization fears, and demands for separate states create federal tensions.
Economic Disparities: Widening gaps between developed and backward states affect federal solidarity and resource allocation.
Solutions Required: Strengthening Inter-State Council, reforming Governor’s office, ensuring fiscal federalism, promoting cooperative federalism, and resolving inter-state disputes through dialogue and institutional mechanisms.
Indian federalism needs continuous adaptation to balance unity with diversity while addressing contemporary governance challenges.
9. (a) Examine the role of the Governor with reference to passage of Bills.
Ans: The Governor’s role in the passage of bills represents a crucial aspect of India’s federal structure, involving complex constitutional powers that balance state autonomy with national unity.
Constitutional Provisions: Under Article 200, when a bill passed by state legislature is presented to the Governor, he has four options: give assent, withhold assent, return the bill for reconsideration (except money bills), or reserve the bill for President’s consideration.
Assent Power: The Governor normally gives assent to bills passed by the state legislature, completing the legislative process. This represents the standard constitutional procedure respecting state legislative autonomy.
Discretionary Powers: The Governor can withhold assent to bills that may be unconstitutional, contrary to national interest, or violate federal principles. However, this power must be exercised judiciously and not for political reasons.
Return Power: The Governor can return non-money bills with recommendations for amendments. If the legislature re-passes the bill with or without amendments, the Governor must give assent, limiting executive veto power.
Reservation Power: Bills can be reserved for President’s consideration in cases involving: bills affecting national security, bills conflicting with central laws, bills affecting High Court jurisdiction, or bills of national importance. The President then decides on assent or withhold.
Contemporary Issues: Governors have been criticized for excessive delays in decision-making, political considerations in bill approval, and misuse of reservation power. Cases like Kerala’s bills on gold smuggling or Tamil Nadu’s bill on NEET have created federal tensions.
Judicial Interpretation: Supreme Court has emphasized that Governor’s discretion must be exercised constitutionally, not arbitrarily, and decisions should be made within reasonable time.
The Governor’s role requires balancing state autonomy with constitutional propriety while avoiding political partisanship.
(b) What are the challenges associated with Governor’s office? Examine.
Ans: The Governor’s office faces significant challenges that affect its constitutional role as the constitutional head of states and its position in India’s federal structure.
Political Neutrality Issues: Governors are often perceived as central government agents rather than constitutional heads. Political appointments, partisan behavior, and alignment with ruling party at center undermine gubernatorial neutrality and federal harmony.
Discretionary Powers Misuse: Article 356 (President’s Rule) has been misused for political purposes to dismiss state governments. The Sarkaria Commission noted that emergency provisions were invoked 106 times, often for political rather than constitutional reasons.
Appointment and Tenure Problems: Governors are appointed by the central government without state consultation, creating loyalty conflicts. Arbitrary removals and short tenures prevent independent functioning and institutional continuity.
Role Ambiguity: Constitutional provisions create confusion between ceremonial and real powers. The Governor’s role in government formation, especially in hung assemblies, becomes controversial when political considerations override constitutional conventions.
Federal Relations Strain: Governors often become sources of center-state conflict through delayed assent to bills, controversial use of discretionary powers, and interference in state administration. This undermines cooperative federalism.
Legislative Issues: Prolonged delays in bill approval, political considerations in reservation of bills, and conflicts with state governments over policy matters create governance deadlock.
Administrative Challenges: Governors face difficulties in balancing constitutional obligations with political pressures, managing relations with elected governments, and maintaining institutional dignity.
Reform Suggestions: The Punchi Commission recommended fixed tenure, limited grounds for removal, consultative appointment process, and clearer guidelines for discretionary powers.
Way Forward: Implementing constitutional conventions, ensuring political neutrality, fixed tenure, and clear role definition can strengthen the Governor’s office and improve federal relations.
Reforming the Governor’s office is essential for maintaining federal balance and constitutional governance.
10. (a) Analyse the role of Government in regulating data privacy and cyber-security.
Ans: The Government’s role in regulating data privacy and cyber-security has become critical in the digital age, requiring comprehensive policy frameworks to protect citizens while enabling digital economy growth.
Regulatory Framework Development: Governments must establish comprehensive legal frameworks governing data collection, processing, storage, and transfer. This includes defining data categories, user consent mechanisms, cross-border data flow regulations, and penalties for violations.
Standard Setting and Compliance: Government agencies develop technical standards for data protection, encryption requirements, security protocols, and compliance auditing mechanisms. Regular updates ensure adaptation to evolving threats and technologies.
Enforcement and Monitoring: Regulatory authorities monitor compliance, investigate violations, impose penalties, and ensure grievance redressal. This requires specialized cyber-crime units, digital forensics capabilities, and international cooperation mechanisms.
Critical Infrastructure Protection: Governments must secure essential services including banking, telecommunications, power grids, and healthcare systems from cyber-attacks through mandatory security standards and incident response protocols.
Public-Private Partnership: Effective regulation requires collaboration with private sector, sharing threat intelligence, developing industry-specific guidelines, and promoting voluntary compliance while avoiding over-regulation that stifles innovation.
International Cooperation: Cyber-security threats are transnational, requiring diplomatic engagement, bilateral agreements, and participation in international forums for information sharing and coordinated response.
Capacity Building: Governments must invest in human resources, technology infrastructure, research and development, and public awareness programs to build national cyber-security capabilities.
Balancing Act: Regulation must balance privacy protection with national security needs, law enforcement requirements, and economic development objectives without creating digital authoritarianism.
Challenges: Rapid technological change, jurisdictional complexities, resource constraints, and balancing multiple stakeholder interests complicate effective regulation.
Government regulation must be adaptive, inclusive, and proportionate to address digital age challenges effectively.
(b) Explain about data privacy and cyber-security framework in India.
Ans: India’s data privacy and cyber-security framework has evolved significantly to address digital transformation challenges while balancing privacy rights with national security and economic development needs.
Legal Framework: The Information Technology Act, 2000 and its 2008 amendments provide the foundational cyber-law framework, covering cyber-crimes, data protection, and digital signatures. Section 43A mandates compensation for negligent data handling, while Section 72A criminalizes disclosure of personal information.
Data Protection Bill: The proposed Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019 (now withdrawn) aimed to establish comprehensive data protection regime with provisions for data localization, user consent, cross-border data transfer restrictions, and establishment of Data Protection Authority.
Institutional Framework: Ministry of Electronics and IT (MeitY) serves as the nodal ministry for cyber-security policy. The Indian Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT-In) handles cyber-security incidents, vulnerabilities, and threat response.
National Cyber Security Strategy: The National Cyber Security Strategy 2020 focuses on building secure cyber-space, enhancing cyber-security research, creating skilled workforce, and strengthening international cooperation.
Sectoral Regulations: Reserve Bank of India guidelines for banking sector, TRAI regulations for telecommunications, and SEBI norms for securities market provide sector-specific data protection and cyber-security requirements.
Recent Developments: IT Rules 2021 mandate social media platforms, OTT platforms, and digital news publishers to follow due diligence and grievance redressal mechanisms. Data localization requirements for payment systems and critical personal data processing.
Challenges: Lack of comprehensive privacy law, enforcement gaps, limited awareness, rapidly evolving technology, and balancing privacy with innovation needs.
Way Forward: Enacting comprehensive data protection legislation, strengthening enforcement mechanisms, building technical capabilities, and promoting industry collaboration are essential for robust framework development.
11. (a) “Power worship blurs political judgement.” Comment on this statement in the light of Indian electoral politics.
Ans: Power worship in Indian electoral politics has significantly distorted political judgment, leading to short-term opportunism, ethical compromises, and governance failures that undermine democratic values and long-term national interest.
Manifestations of Power Worship: Political leaders often prioritize electoral victory over policy coherence, making populist promises without considering fiscal implications or implementation challenges. Dynasty politics in various parties reflects power concentration within families rather than merit-based leadership selection.
Coalition Compromises: The pursuit of power leads to ideologically incompatible alliances where parties compromise core principles for electoral gains. This results in policy paralysis, contradictory positions, and governance instability when ideological differences surface.
Electoral Strategies: Power-centric approach encourages divisive politics, communal polarization, and caste-based mobilization to win elections. Political judgment becomes subordinated to vote-bank calculations rather than national interest or policy effectiveness.
Corruption and Governance: The desperation to acquire and retain power leads to corruption, policy decisions favoring specific interest groups, and misuse of government machinery for electoral purposes. This compromises institutional integrity and governance quality.
Leadership Quality: Power worship attracts opportunistic leaders rather than those with vision and integrity. Political recruitment focuses on winnability rather than competence, leading to deterioration in leadership quality.
Policy Implications: Important long-term reforms are postponed or diluted due to electoral considerations. Economic reforms, subsidy rationalization, and structural changes become victims of power politics.
Democratic Implications: Excessive focus on power acquisition undermines democratic debate, policy deliberation, and institutional development. Opposition parties focus more on government defeat than constructive alternatives.
Way Forward: Strengthening democratic institutions, promoting intra-party democracy, encouraging issue-based politics, and educating voters about policy implications can reduce power worship’s negative impact on political judgment.
(b) “Democracy governed by a dominant party appears very different from a democracy with no dominant party.” Comment in Indian experience.
Ans: India’s democratic experience demonstrates stark differences between dominant party era (1947-1977) and multi-party coalition era (post-1989), significantly impacting governance patterns, policy-making, and federal relations.
Dominant Party Era Characteristics: The Congress Party’s dominance under Nehru and Indira Gandhi enabled decisive policy-making, long-term planning, and implementation of major reforms like land reforms, linguistic reorganization, and economic planning. Strong central authority facilitated national integration and development programs.
Policy Coherence: Dominant party system allowed consistent policy direction over decades, enabling completion of major projects like steel plants, dams, and educational institutions. Five-Year Plans could be implemented with continuity and commitment.
Federal Relations: Cooperative federalism was easier with Congress controlling both center and most states. Policy coordination, resource allocation, and development programs faced fewer political obstacles.
Challenges of Dominance: However, it also led to authoritarianism (Emergency 1975-77), dynastic politics, centralization of power, and reduced accountability. Opposition voices were marginalized, and intra-party democracy declined.
Multi-Party Democracy Benefits: Post-1989 coalition era brought greater representation of diverse social groups, regional interests, and marginalized communities. Federal balance improved with regional parties gaining prominence and demanding greater state autonomy.
Policy Challenges: Coalition politics created policy paralysis on controversial reforms, frequent government changes, and policy reversals. Economic liberalization required extensive negotiations and compromises.
Governance Complexity: Multi-party democracy necessitated consensus-building, power-sharing arrangements, and accommodation of diverse interests. This slowed decision-making but enhanced democratic legitimacy.
Contemporary Reality: Modern India demonstrates that robust opposition, coalition governance, and competitive federalism have strengthened democracy despite governance challenges.
Both systems have merits: dominant party enables decisive governance, while multi-party democracy ensures representation and accountability.
12. (a) Trace out the causes for Inter-State border disputes in India.
Ans: Inter-State border disputes in India stem from historical, linguistic, administrative, and political factors that have created persistent conflicts affecting federal harmony and regional development.
Historical Legacy: Colonial administrative boundaries were drawn for administrative convenience rather than linguistic or cultural coherence. British policies often ignored traditional territorial claims, cultural boundaries, and local aspirations, creating artificial divisions that became sources of future disputes.
Linguistic Reorganization: The States Reorganization Act, 1956 redrew state boundaries on linguistic basis but couldn’t address all territorial claims. Multi-lingual border areas, overlapping linguistic zones, and incomplete reorganization left several disputes unresolved.
Administrative Confusion: Survey and settlement records from colonial period often contained discrepancies, overlapping claims, and unclear demarcations. Different administrative systems in princely states and British territories created confusion about actual boundaries.
Political Mobilization: Regional political parties exploit border disputes for electoral gains, mobilizing linguistic and cultural sentiments. Political leaders make emotional appeals about territorial integrity to consolidate vote banks.
Economic Factors: Disputes over resource-rich areas including mineral deposits, forest land, agricultural regions, and water sources intensify territorial claims. Revenue considerations and development potential make certain areas contentious.
Cultural and Linguistic Identity: Linguistic minorities in border areas often seek inclusion in states where their language has official status. Cultural affinity and administrative convenience in native language create demands for boundary modifications.
Demographic Changes: Migration patterns, urbanization, and changing demographic composition alter local aspirations and territorial claims over time.
Legal and Constitutional Issues: Article 3 allows Parliament to alter state boundaries but requires state consultation. However, this process often becomes politically contentious and legally complex.
Major disputes include Karnataka-Maharashtra (Belgaum), Assam-Meghalaya, Punjab-Haryana (Chandigarh), and various other boundary conflicts reflecting these underlying causes.
(b) Discuss the issues and the mechanism to resolve border issues.
Ans: Inter-state border disputes present complex challenges requiring comprehensive mechanisms that address legal, political, administrative, and social dimensions while maintaining federal harmony.
Major Issues:
Legal Complexity: Disputes involve interpretation of historical documents, survey records, and colonial administrative orders. Different states present conflicting evidence, making legal resolution difficult.
Political Sensitivity: Border issues become electoral weapons with political parties taking rigid positions to appeal to linguistic and regional sentiments. This prevents flexible negotiations and compromise solutions.
Administrative Challenges: Dual administration in disputed areas creates governance problems, service delivery issues, and law enforcement difficulties. Citizens face uncertainty about jurisdiction and administrative services.
Social Impact: Border disputes create identity conflicts among residents, affect inter-state relations, and sometimes lead to violence and communal tensions.
Resolution Mechanisms:
Constitutional Provisions: Article 3 empowers Parliament to alter state boundaries after consulting affected states. However, consultation is not binding, and political considerations often dominate.
Judicial Intervention: Supreme Court under Article 131 has original jurisdiction over inter-state disputes. Courts can provide legal clarity but political implementation remains challenging.
Administrative Solutions: Boundary Commissions appointed by central government investigate disputes and recommend solutions. The Mahajan Commission (Maharashtra-Mysore) and Shah Commission (Haryana-Punjab) exemplify this approach.
Political Negotiations: Inter-State Council under Article 263 provides platform for political dialogue and negotiation. Chief Ministers’ meetings and central mediation can facilitate compromise solutions.
Parliamentary Process: Constitutional amendments or new legislation can resolve disputes through political process, though this requires broad consensus.
Innovative Approaches: Joint administration, special status for disputed areas, compensation packages, and development incentives can provide creative solutions.
Way Forward: Strengthening institutional mechanisms, promoting dialogue, avoiding politicization, and focusing on development rather than territorial claims can help resolve persistent border disputes while maintaining federal unity.
13. (a) Examine the concerns of Odisha State in respect of sharing of Mahanadi water.
Ans: Odisha’s concerns regarding Mahanadi water sharing reflect broader issues of river water disputes, upstream-downstream conflicts, and federal water governance challenges affecting agricultural security and development.
Reduced Water Flow: Odisha experiences significant reduction in Mahanadi water flow due to upstream water diversions, dam constructions, and increased water extraction in Chhattisgarh. This affects agriculture, drinking water supply, and ecological balance in deltaic regions.
Upstream Development Impact: Chhattisgarh’s industrial development, particularly steel and power plants, has increased water consumption and pollution levels. Multiple barrages and check dams have altered natural flow patterns, affecting downstream agriculture and fishing communities.
Agricultural Crisis: Reduced river flow particularly during lean season affects kharif and rabi crops in coastal districts. Saltwater intrusion in deltaic areas due to reduced freshwater flow damages agricultural productivity and soil quality.
Drinking Water Security: Rural and urban areas in coastal Odisha face drinking water shortage during summer months due to reduced river flow and groundwater depletion caused by inadequate river recharge.
Environmental Concerns: Ecological degradation of Mahanadi delta, including loss of biodiversity, reduced fish production, and mangrove destruction, affects livelihoods of fishing communities and environmental sustainability.
Historical Rights: Odisha claims historical precedence in Mahanadi water use and argues that downstream states have established rights that should be protected. The state emphasizes its dependence on river for survival and development.
Legal Position: Odisha argues that Chhattisgarh should have consulted downstream states before constructing major projects as per interstate river water principles and Supreme Court guidelines.
Development Impact: Industrial and infrastructure development in Odisha gets affected due to water shortage, hampering economic growth and employment generation in the state.
These concerns reflect broader challenges of river water governance in federal India requiring comprehensive resolution mechanisms.
(b) Examine the status of Chhattisgarh-Odisha Mahanadi water dispute. What is the way forward?
Ans: The Chhattisgarh-Odisha Mahanadi water dispute represents a complex inter-state river water conflict requiring comprehensive resolution through legal, administrative, and political mechanisms while ensuring equitable water sharing and sustainable development.
Current Status:
Mahanadi Water Disputes Tribunal: Constituted in 2018 under the Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, the tribunal is examining claims of both states. Odisha seeks regulation of upstream projects, while Chhattisgarh argues for its developmental rights.
Central Intervention: The Central Water Commission has been monitoring water flows and collecting data to establish baseline information. Technical committees have been formed to assess water availability and requirements.
Legal Proceedings: Supreme Court has been hearing related petitions, emphasizing need for cooperative federalism and scientific water sharing. The court has stressed avoiding politicization and focusing on technical solutions.
State Positions: Odisha demands minimum water release guarantees, consultation rights for future projects, and compensation for past losses. Chhattisgarh argues for its right to utilize water resources for development while ensuring reasonable downstream flow.
Way Forward:
Scientific Approach: Comprehensive hydrological studies, water balance assessments, and environmental impact evaluations should guide water sharing decisions rather than political considerations.
Technological Solutions: Water conservation, efficiency improvements, rainwater harvesting, and alternative water sources can reduce overall demand and minimize conflicts.
Cooperative Framework: Joint river basin management with shared institutions, regular monitoring, and coordinated development planning can ensure sustainable utilization.
Compensation Mechanism: Benefit-sharing arrangements where upstream states receive compensation for environmental services and downstream states get assured water supply can create win-win solutions.
Environmental Protection: Ecological flow maintenance, pollution control, and watershed management should be mandatory components of any water sharing agreement.
Legal Clarity: Early tribunal award with clear guidelines on water allocation, project approvals, and monitoring mechanisms can provide certainty for both states.
Sustainable resolution requires balancing developmental aspirations with ecological sustainability and equitable water sharing principles.
14. (a) What is Social Justice and what is the status of woman in Indian society?
Ans: Social Justice encompasses equitable distribution of opportunities, resources, and privileges within society, ensuring dignity, equality, and fundamental rights for all individuals regardless of gender, caste, class, or social background.
Concept of Social Justice: It involves eliminating discrimination, providing equal opportunities, protecting vulnerable groups, and creating conditions for human dignity and development. Social justice requires both distributive justice (fair allocation of resources) and recognition justice (respect for diverse identities).
Status of Women in Indian Society:
Historical Context: Traditional Indian society was largely patriarchal with women having limited autonomy, property rights, and social mobility. Practices like child marriage, sati, purdah, and widow remarriage prohibition reflected gender discrimination.
Contemporary Challenges: Despite constitutional equality, women face multiple disadvantages including lower literacy rates, workforce participation gaps, wage disparities, and limited political representation. Gender-based violence, including domestic violence, sexual harassment, and trafficking, remains prevalent.
Educational Progress: Female literacy has improved significantly from 8.9% (1951) to 70.3% (2011), though gender gap persists. Girls’ enrollment in schools has increased, but dropout rates remain higher due to social barriers.
Economic Participation: Women’s labor force participation is declining (24% in 1999-2000 to 20.3% in 2011-12) despite educational improvements. Occupational segregation, wage gaps, and lack of childcare support limit economic empowerment.
Political Representation: Women constitute only 14.4% of Lok Sabha and 11% of Rajya Sabha members despite 50% population share. However, 73rd and 74th Amendments reserving 33% seats in Panchayats have enhanced grassroots political participation.
Social Indicators: Child sex ratio decline (927 in 2011), preference for male children, and gender-based discrimination in healthcare and nutrition reflect deep-rooted social biases.
Legal Progress: Constitutional provisions, legal reforms, and policy initiatives have created framework for gender equality, but implementation gaps persist.
(b) Examine the legal status of women in India.
Ans: The legal status of women in India has evolved significantly through constitutional provisions, legislative reforms, and judicial interpretations, creating a comprehensive framework for gender equality while implementation challenges persist.
Constitutional Provisions: Article 14 guarantees equality before law, Article 15 prohibits gender-based discrimination while allowing positive discrimination, and Article 16 ensures equal employment opportunities. These provisions establish legal foundation for women’s rights.
Personal Laws: Hindu Marriage Act (1955), Hindu Succession Act (1956, amended 2005), and Special Marriage Act (1954) provide legal framework for marriage, divorce, and inheritance. The 2005 amendment granted equal inheritance rights to daughters in ancestral property.
Criminal Law Protection: Indian Penal Code criminally protections against rape, domestic violence, dowry harassment, and sexual assault. The Criminal Law Amendment Act (2013) strengthened anti-rape laws with enhanced punishment and broader definitions.
Specific Legislations: Dowry Prohibition Act (1961), Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (2005), Sexual Harassment at Workplace Act (2013), and Maternity Benefit Act (2017) provide comprehensive legal protection.
Economic Rights: Equal Remuneration Act (1976) mandates equal pay for equal work, while various labor laws provide maternity benefits, safe working conditions, and prohibition of hazardous work for women.
Political Rights: 73rd and 74th Amendments reserve 33% seats for women in Panchayats and Municipalities. The proposed Women’s Reservation Bill seeks similar reservation in Parliament and State Assemblies.
Recent Developments: Triple Talaq Act (2019) criminalizes instant divorce, Citizenship Amendment Act provisions, and various Supreme Court judgments on gender equality have further strengthened women’s legal position.
Implementation Challenges: Despite robust legal framework, enforcement gaps, social resistance, judicial delays, and lack of awareness limit effective implementation of women’s legal rights.
The legal status has significantly improved, but translating legal rights into social reality remains challenging.
15. (a) What are the Constitutional provisions of Social Justice guaranteed in India?
Ans: The Indian Constitution comprehensively guarantees Social Justice through fundamental rights, directive principles, and special provisions, reflecting the founders’ commitment to creating an egalitarian society that protects vulnerable groups and promotes inclusive development.
Fundamental Rights for Social Justice:
Article 14 ensures equality before law and equal protection, forming the cornerstone of social justice by prohibiting arbitrary discrimination and guaranteeing equal treatment to all citizens.
Article 15 prohibits discrimination based on religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth while permitting positive discrimination for women, children, and socially disadvantaged groups. This enables affirmative action policies.
Article 16 guarantees equality of opportunity in public employment while allowing reservation for backward classes, ensuring representation of marginalized communities in government services.
Article 17 abolishes untouchability and prohibits its practice, directly addressing caste-based discrimination and social hierarchy.
Article 21 guarantees right to life and personal liberty, interpreted by courts to include right to livelihood, education, healthcare, and dignified living conditions.
Directive Principles of State Policy:
Article 38 directs the state to promote welfare and minimize inequalities in income, status, and opportunities among individuals and groups.
Article 39 mandates equal right to livelihood, prevention of wealth concentration, and ensuring economic systems serve common good rather than individual interests.
Articles 41-42 promote right to work, education, and public assistance while ensuring humane working conditions, establishing state obligations for social security.
Article 46 specifically directs promotion of educational and economic interests of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and weaker sections with protection from social injustice and exploitation.
Special Constitutional Provisions:
Reservation System: Articles 330, 332, and 335 provide reservation in legislatures and services for SCs and STs, ensuring political representation and economic opportunities for historically disadvantaged groups.
Fifth and Sixth Schedules provide special protections for tribal areas, preserving cultural identity and self-governance while ensuring development and protection from exploitation.
Article 243D and related provisions ensure reservation for women, SCs, and STs in Panchayati Raj institutions, promoting grassroots democratic participation.
Article 350A directs states to provide primary education in mother tongue for linguistic minorities, protecting cultural and educational rights.
These constitutional provisions create a comprehensive framework for achieving social justice through legal equality, positive discrimination, and state-directed welfare measures.
(b) Discuss about Government of India’s initiatives to make Social Justice a reality.
Ans: The Government of India has implemented numerous initiatives across education, employment, healthcare, and empowerment sectors to translate constitutional provisions of social justice into practical reality for marginalized and vulnerable communities.
Educational Initiatives:
Right to Education Act (2009) ensures free and compulsory education for children aged 6-14 years with 25% reservation for disadvantaged groups in private schools. Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan and Rashtriya Madhyamik Shiksha Abhiyan focus on universalizing elementary and secondary education.
Scholarship schemes like Post-Matric Scholarship for SCs/STs, Merit-cum-Means Scholarship, and various fellowship programs support higher education access for marginalized communities.
Employment and Economic Empowerment:
Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) provides 100 days guaranteed employment with one-third participation reserved for women, ensuring livelihood security for rural poor.
Stand-Up India and Mudra Yojana promote entrepreneurship among SCs, STs, and women through financial support and skill development programs.
Reservation policies in government jobs (15% for SCs, 7.5% for STs, 27% for OBCs) ensure representation in public employment.
Social Security Measures:
Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (Ayushman Bharat) provides health insurance coverage up to ₹5 lakh for poor families, ensuring healthcare access.
National Social Assistance Programme includes old-age pension, widow pension, and disability pension schemes for vulnerable populations.
Women Empowerment:
Beti Bachao Beti Padhao addresses declining child sex ratio and promotes girls’ education. Pradhan Mantri Matru Vandana Yojana provides maternity benefits.
Digital India initiatives include Digital Gender Atlas and Women Safety Apps for enhanced security and empowerment.
Housing and Infrastructure:
Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana ensures housing for all with priority for SCs, STs, and women. Swachh Bharat Mission improves sanitation particularly benefiting women and marginalized communities.
These comprehensive initiatives demonstrate government commitment to achieving social justice through targeted interventions and inclusive development strategies.
16. (a) (i) Explain democratic decentralisation.
Ans: Democratic decentralisation refers to the systematic transfer of political power, administrative authority, and financial resources from central/state governments to local self-governing institutions, enabling grassroots participation in democratic governance and development planning.
Core Principles: Democratic decentralisation involves devolution of powers across three dimensions: political (decision-making authority), administrative (implementation capacity), and fiscal (financial resources). This creates multi-tiered governance structure bringing democracy closer to people.
Key Features include elected local bodies with constitutional status, functional autonomy in designated subjects, financial powers including taxation and expenditure authority, and accountability mechanisms ensuring responsiveness to local communities.
Theoretical Foundation: Based on subsidiarity principle, it argues that governance functions should be performed at the lowest appropriate level. This enhances efficiency through local knowledge, effectiveness through community participation, and responsiveness through direct accountability.
Types: Political decentralisation transfers decision-making authority to elected local representatives. Administrative decentralisation involves delegation of implementation responsibilities. Fiscal decentralisation provides revenue-raising and expenditure powers.
Benefits include enhanced participation in decision-making, improved service delivery through local knowledge, greater accountability through proximity, capacity building at grassroots level, and democratic deepening through expanded political participation.
Challenges: Capacity constraints, elite capture, financial inadequacy, coordination problems between different levels, and political resistance from higher levels can limit effectiveness.
Global Examples: Countries like Brazil, South Africa, and India have implemented significant democratic decentralisation reforms, while European Union promotes subsidiarity principle in governance.
Indian Context: The 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments represent landmark democratic decentralisation initiatives, creating constitutional framework for Panchayati Raj and Urban Local Bodies.
(ii) Examine the impact of 73rd Constitutional Amendment on decentralisation of power and functioning of Panchayats.
Ans: The 73rd Constitutional Amendment (1992) revolutionized rural governance in India by constitutionalizing Panchayati Raj institutions, creating a three-tier democratic decentralisation framework that significantly impacted power distribution and grassroots democracy.
Constitutional Status: The amendment added Part IX to the Constitution, providing constitutional protection to Panchayats and making their dissolution subject to constitutional safeguards rather than state government discretion.
Mandatory Provisions: States were required to establish three-tier structure (Village, Block, and District Panchayats), conduct regular elections within six months of dissolution, and provide reservation for SCs (proportionate to population), STs (proportionate to population), and women (not less than one-third).
Devolution of Powers: Article 243G empowers state legislatures to endow Panchayats with powers and authority for economic development and social justice planning. The 11th Schedule lists 29 subjects including agriculture, health, education, and rural development.
Financial Empowerment: State Finance Commissions were mandated to recommend fiscal devolution, enabling Panchayats to levy taxes, receive grants from state governments, and manage development funds.
Democratic Impact:
Political Participation: Over 31 lakh elected representatives including 14 lakh women participate in Panchayati Raj, significantly expanding democratic base and political awareness in rural areas.
Women’s Empowerment: Reserved seats have brought 10 lakh women into elected positions, transforming gender dynamics in rural politics and decision-making processes.
Social Inclusion: SC/ST reservation has enabled marginalized communities to participate in local governance, challenging traditional power structures and promoting social justice.
Functional Transformation:
Planning and Implementation: Panchayats now prepare Gram Panchayat Development Plans, implement schemes like MGNREGA, and participate in district planning processes.
Service Delivery: Improved delivery of health, education, and welfare services through local oversight and community participation.
Challenges: Inadequate devolution by states, capacity constraints, elite capture, and parallel institutions limit the amendment’s full potential.
The 73rd Amendment has democratized rural governance while implementation varies across states.
(b) Examine the impact of 74th Constitutional Amendment on decentralisation of power and functioning of Municipalities.
Ans: The 74th Constitutional Amendment (1992) transformed urban governance by constitutionalizing Urban Local Bodies (ULBs), creating democratic framework for cities and towns while addressing urbanization challenges through decentralized governance.
Constitutional Framework: Part IXA was added to the Constitution, providing constitutional status to three categories of municipalities: Nagar Panchayats (transitional areas), Municipal Councils (smaller urban areas), and Municipal Corporations (larger urban areas).
Mandatory Provisions: States must conduct regular elections, provide reservation for SCs/STs (proportionate to population) and women (not less than one-third including chairpersons), and establish State Election Commissions for conducting municipal elections.
Functional Devolution: Article 243W empowers state legislatures to endow municipalities with powers for economic development and social justice. The 12th Schedule lists 18 functions including urban planning, water supply, public health, fire services, and slum improvement.
Financial Autonomy: State Finance Commissions recommend financial devolution to ULBs, enabling them to levy taxes (property tax, profession tax), collect fees and user charges, and receive grants from state and central governments.
Democratic Impact:
Political Representation: Over 30 lakh elected representatives including significant women participation have enhanced democratic legitimacy in urban governance.
Women’s Participation: One-third reservation has brought approximately 10 lakh women into urban local politics, challenging traditional male dominance in municipal governance.
Social Inclusion: SC/ST reservation has improved representation of marginalized communities in urban decision-making processes.
Governance Transformation:
Service Delivery: Improved urban services including waste management, water supply, street lighting, and infrastructure maintenance through local oversight and community participation.
Planning Functions: Municipalities now prepare City Development Plans, participate in urban planning, and implement various urban development schemes.
Financial Management: Enhanced revenue generation through property tax reforms, user charges, and efficient financial management practices.
Challenges:
Limited Devolution: Many states have not fully devolved functions, resulting in weak municipalities with limited autonomy and resources.
Capacity Constraints: Technical and administrative capacity limitations affect effective service delivery and implementation of development programs.
Financial Inadequacy: Revenue-expenditure mismatch and dependence on state transfers limit municipal autonomy and effectiveness.
Despite challenges, the 74th Amendment has strengthened urban democracy and improved municipal governance across India.
17. (a) What is Freebie? Draw the difference between Freebies and Welfare.
Ans: Freebies refer to goods and services provided by governments without adequate consideration of fiscal sustainability, targeting specific voter groups primarily for electoral gains rather than addressing genuine welfare needs or long-term development objectives.
Characteristics of Freebies: They are typically election promises made without proper budgetary planning, target specific demographics for political advantage, lack means testing or eligibility criteria, and often compromise fiscal discipline without generating corresponding economic benefits.
Examples include free laptops, smartphones, scooters, gold coins, farm loan waivers without agricultural productivity improvements, free electricity without promoting conservation, and cash transfers without development linkages.
Welfare Measures: These are systematic interventions designed to address market failures, reduce poverty, ensure basic human needs, and promote inclusive development through evidence-based policy design.
Key Differences:
Objective: Freebies primarily aim at electoral gains and vote-bank politics, while welfare measures focus on human development, poverty reduction, and social justice.
Targeting: Freebies often benefit middle-class or influential groups for political impact, whereas welfare programs target genuinely needy and vulnerable populations through proper identification mechanisms.
Fiscal Planning: Welfare measures involve proper budgetary allocation, cost-benefit analysis, and sustainable financing mechanisms. Freebies often lack fiscal planning and burden future generations.
Conditionalities: Welfare programs typically include conditionalities promoting behavioral change (school attendance, health check-ups, skill development), while freebies provide unconditional benefits.
Long-term Impact: Welfare measures build human capital, enhance productivity, and promote economic growth. Freebies may create dependency without sustainable development.
Examples of Welfare: MGNREGA with work guarantee, scholarship schemes with educational performance criteria, healthcare programs with preventive care components, and skill development programs linked to employment.
Evaluation Criteria: Transparency, targeting efficiency, fiscal sustainability, development outcomes, and institutional capacity distinguish welfare measures from freebies.
The distinction requires evaluating whether policies serve genuine welfare needs or merely electoral interests.
(b) “Freebies culture by political parties is a double-edged sword.” Examine this statement.
Ans: The freebies culture in Indian politics presents both opportunities for welfare enhancement and risks to fiscal sustainability and democratic governance, creating complex trade-offs that require careful evaluation and balanced approach.
Positive Aspects:
Immediate Relief: Freebies can provide quick relief to economically distressed populations, addressing urgent needs during economic crises, natural disasters, or market failures. Farm loan waivers during agricultural distress exemplify this benefit.
Political Inclusion: Targeted freebies can enhance political participation of marginalized communities by demonstrating government responsiveness and creating stakes in democratic processes.
Redistributive Justice: Well-designed freebies can serve redistributive purposes, transferring resources from affluent to poor sections, potentially reducing inequality and promoting social justice.
Economic Stimulus: Cash transfers and subsidies can stimulate local demand, support small businesses, and provide economic multiplier effects during recession periods.
Negative Consequences:
Fiscal Burden: Unsustainable expenditure on freebies compromises fiscal discipline, reduces resources for productive investments in infrastructure, education, and healthcare, and burdens future generations with debt.
Distorted Priorities: Electoral competition based on freebies diverts attention from governance improvements, institutional reforms, and long-term development planning.
Dependency Culture: Regular freebies can create dependency syndrome, reducing work incentives, entrepreneurial spirit, and self-reliance among beneficiaries.
Market Distortions: Free electricity, water, and subsidized goods lead to overconsumption, resource wastage, and inefficient allocation, harming environmental sustainability.
Democratic Implications:
Vote Buying: Freebies can amount to indirect vote purchasing, undermining democratic principles of informed choice and policy-based electoral competition.
Institutional Weakness: Populist competition weakens institutions, reduces administrative capacity, and promotes short-term thinking over long-term planning.
Inter-generational Equity: Current benefits funded through borrowing burden future generations without corresponding development benefits.
Way Forward: Means testing, conditionalities linking benefits to development outcomes, fiscal responsibility legislation, transparent budgeting, and public debate on costs and benefits can help harness positive aspects while minimizing negative consequences.
The challenge lies in distinguishing between legitimate welfare measures and electorally motivated freebies while ensuring fiscal sustainability and developmental effectiveness.
Read: OPSC Notes