Q. Some recent developments such as introduction of RTI Act, media and judicial activism etc., are proving helpful in bringing about greater transparency and accountability in the functioning of the Government. However, it is also being observed that at times the mechanisms are misused. Another negative effect is that the officers are now afraid to take prompt decisions. Analyze this situation in detail and suggest how this dichotomy can be resolved. Suggest how these negative impacts can be minimized.
Ans: The introduction of the RTI Act, media vigilance, and judicial activism has significantly enhanced transparency and accountability in governance. These mechanisms empower citizens, expose corruption, and uphold democratic values. However, their misuse and overreach have led to unintended consequences, including administrative hesitation and decision paralysis.
Analysis of the Dichotomy
- Positive Outcomes:
- RTI enables citizens to access government records, promoting participatory governance.
- Media and judiciary act as watchdogs, ensuring public accountability.
- These tools have exposed scams and improved service delivery.
- Negative Impacts:
- Frivolous RTI queries burden officials and divert resources.
- Sensationalist media trials undermine due process and morale.
- Judicial overreach may encroach upon executive discretion.
- Officers fear personal vilification, leading to delayed or risk-averse decisions.
Resolving the Dichotomy and Minimizing Negative Impacts
- Strengthen RTI norms to filter repetitive or irrelevant queries.
- Promote voluntary disclosure and proactive transparency.
- Conduct training programs for officials on ethical decision-making and legal safeguards.
- Encourage balanced media reporting and responsible journalism.
- Define clear boundaries for judicial activism to preserve institutional harmony.
- Reward bold and honest decision-making through performance-linked incentives.
- Establish internal grievance redressal mechanisms to protect officers from undue harassment.
In conclusion, a balanced approach that safeguards transparency while empowering honest officials is essential for effective and ethical governance.